Evaluation of The Total Laboratory Performance of Our Clinical Laboratory with Six-Sigma Method    
Yazarlar (3)
Doç. Dr. Muzaffer KATAR Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Doç. Dr. Köksal DEVECİ Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Doç. Dr. Zeliha Cansel ÖZMEN Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Makale Türü Açık Erişim Özgün Makale
Makale Alt Türü Uluslararası alan indekslerindeki dergilerde yayınlanan tam makale
Dergi Adı Journal of Contemporary Medicine
Dergi ISSN 2667-7180
Dergi Tarandığı Indeksler Türkiye Atıf Dizini, TürkMedline, İndex Copernicus, DOAJ
Makale Dili İngilizce
Basım Tarihi 01-2021
Cilt No 11
Sayı 1
Sayfalar 34 / 40
DOI Numarası 10.16899/jcm.770304
Makale Linki https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jcm/issue/57927/770304
Özet
Aim In order to evaluate the performance of the clinical laboratories, a quality measurement method, The Six-Sigma Methodology, is used. We aimed to evaluate the analytical performance of our clinical laboratory by using the internal and external quality control data of 28 analytes, and by calculating their process sigma values. Methods Sigma values of 28 analytes of our laboratory were determined from coefficient of variation (CV %) and bias for 3 subsequent months from December 2018 to January 2019. If the sigma values are >6, between 3 and 6, and <3, they are classified as »world-class«, »good« or »un-acceptable«, respectively. Results 6 (21%) analytes; T Protein, Creatinin, Ca, Na, Cl, HbA1c; provided <3 sigma value, 1 (04%) analyte; lipase; provided between 3-6 value and 11 (39%) analytes; amylase, GGT, ALT, LDH, CRP, Lactate, BUN, Direct Bil., T Bil., CK and CK-MB; provided > 6 sigma value for both IQC1 and IQC2 levels for three consecutive months, respectively. Conclusions In terms of Six-Sigma Metrics; our results were generally found as world-class or good. An appropriate quality control scheduling should be carried out for each test by using Six-Sigma Methodology in all clinical chemistry laboratories.
Anahtar Kelimeler