Effects of Novel Finishing and Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness and Morphology of Nanocomposites
Yazarlar (5)
Fatma Aytaç Bal Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Doç. Dr. Emine ŞİRİN KARAARSLAN Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Emine Taştan
Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Mehmet Buldur Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Öğr. Gör. Yunus Emre KUYUCU Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Türkiye
| Makale Türü | Özgün Makale (SSCI, AHCI, SCI, SCI-Exp dergilerinde yayınlanan tam makale) | ||
| Dergi Adı | Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry (Q4) | ||
| Dergi ISSN | 1496-4155 Wos Dergi Scopus Dergi | ||
| Dergi Tarandığı Indeksler | SCI-Expanded | ||
| Makale Dili | İngilizce | Basım Tarihi | 07-2016 |
| Cilt / Sayı / Sayfa | 28 / 4 / 247–261 | DOI | 10.1111/jerd.12215 |
| Makale Linki | http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/jerd.12215 | ||
| Özet |
| AbstractObjectivesThe purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effects of different finishing/polishing techniques on the surface roughness of nanocomposites after thermocycling aging.Materials and MethodsFive contemporary resin‐based composites (Clearfil Majesty ES‐2, Filtek Z550, Estelite∑Quick, Zenit, Filtek Z250) were tested. For each resin‐based composite, 50 disc‐shaped specimens were prepared and groups were divided into five subgroups according to the finishing/polishing methods (n = 10): control, finishing/polishing brush, finishing/polishing disc, and two different finishing/polishing wheels. Before and after aging, the surface roughness of specimens was measured. For each treatment method two samples were analyzed using a scanning electron microscope. Two‐way analysis of variance and paired samples t‐tests were used to evaluate the data and the means were compared by Bonferroni tests (p ≤ 0.05).ResultsBefore aging, the Filtek Z250 resin with the Mylar strip group showed the lowest surface roughness (Ra) value (0.13 ± 0.03 µm, p < 0.05) and the Clearfil Majesty ES 2 resin with Occlubrush finishing/polishing system showed the highest (0.7 ± 0.13 µm, p < 0.05). After aging, the Clearfil Majesty ES 2 resin with the Mylar strip group showed the highest surface roughness (Ra) value (0.96 ± 0.4 µm) and the Clearfil Majesty ES 2 resin with the Sof‐Lex aluminum oxide disc finishing/polishing system showed the lowest surface roughness (Ra) value (0.25 ± 0.06 µm, p < 0.05).ConclusionsComposite type and finishing/polishing method significantly affected the surface roughness of composites before and after thermocycling aging.Clinical SignificanceThere were significant interactions between finishing/polishing methods and composite types for surface roughness. The results give clinicians some flexibility in choosing appropriate finishing/polishing techniques for each resin composite material. (J Esthet Restor Dent 28:247–261, 2016) |
| Anahtar Kelimeler |
BM Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları
| Atıf Sayıları |