Effects of Small-Sided Games Training versus High-Intensity Interval Training Approaches in Young Basketball Players
Yazarlar (9)
Prof. Dr. Erşan ARSLAN Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Prof. Dr. Bülent KİLİT Tekirdağ Namık Kemal Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Fılıpe Manuel Clemente Instituto Politécnico De Viana Do Castelo, Portekiz
Eugenıa Murawska-Cıalowıcz Akademia Wychowania Fizycznego We Wroclawiu, Polonya
Doç. Dr. Yusuf Soylu Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Mustafa Söğüt Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Fırat Akça Ankara Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Mine Gökkaya Ankara Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Ana Fılıpa Sılva Instituto Politécnico De Viana Do Castelo, Portekiz
Makale Türü Açık Erişim Özgün Makale (SCOPUS dergilerinde yayınlanan tam makale)
Dergi Adı International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Dergi ISSN 1661-7827 Dergi Bilgileri (2022)
Dergi Tarandığı Indeksler SSCI
Makale Dili İngilizce Basım Tarihi 03-2022
Kabul Tarihi – Yayınlanma Tarihi 02-03-2022
Cilt / Sayı / Sayfa 19 / 5 / 2931–0 DOI 10.3390/ijerph19052931
Makale Linki https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/5/2931
UAK Araştırma Alanları
Antrenman Fiziksel Aktivite ve Sağlık
Özet
This study aimed to investigate the effects of the 6-week small-sided games training (SSGs) vs. high-intensity interval training (HIIT) on the psychophysiological and performance responses, and technical skills of young basketball players. Thirty-two male players (age: 14.5 ± 0.5 years of age) were randomly divided into SSGs group (n = 16) and HIIT group (n = 16) training methods thrice per week for 6 weeks. The players in the SSGs group performed two 5–8 min of 2 vs. 2 with 2 min rest periods, while the players in HIIT performed 12–18 min of runs at intensities (90 to 95%) related to the velocity obtained in the 30-15 intermittent fitness test (IFT). Pre-testing and post-testing sessions involved assessments of Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Test level 1, 30-15 intermittent fitness test, 5 and 30 m sprint times, vertical jump height, repeated sprint ability, defensive and offensive agility, and technical skills. The SSGs group demonstrated significantly higher agility-based technical responses in terms of the control dribbling and shooting skills (d = 1.71 vs. 0.20, d = 1.41 vs. 0.35, respectively) compared with the HIIT group. Conversely, the HIIT induced greater improvements in 30 m sprint times (d = 3.15 vs. 0.68). These findings provided that SSGs in youth basketball players may allow similar positive physical adaptations to HIIT, with an extra advantage of improving technical skills while improving enjoyability.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Agility | Interval training | Perceived exertion | Physical enjoyment | Psychophysiological responses
BM Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları
Atıf Sayıları
Yöksis 13
Scopus 65
Google Scholar 118
PubMed 39
Effects of Small-Sided Games Training versus High-Intensity Interval Training Approaches in Young Basketball Players