Running-based high-intensity interval training vs. small-sided game training programs: effects on the physical performance, psychophysiological responses and technical skills in young soccer players
Yazarlar (3)
Prof. Dr. Erşan ARSLAN
Siirt Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, Türkiye
Instituto Politécnico De Viana Do Castelo, Portekiz
| Makale Türü |
Özgün Makale
|
| Makale Alt Türü | SSCI, AHCI, SCI, SCI-Exp dergilerinde yayınlanan tam makale |
| Dergi Adı | Biology of Sport |
| Dergi ISSN | 0860-021X Wos Dergi Scopus Dergi |
| Dergi Tarandığı Indeksler | SCI-Expanded |
| Dergi Grubu | Q4 |
| Makale Dili | İngilizce |
| Basım Tarihi | 01-2020 |
| Cilt No | 37 |
| Sayı | 2 |
| Sayfalar | 165 / 173 |
| DOI Numarası | 10.5114/BIOLSPORT.2020.94237 |
| Makale Linki | https://www.termedia.pl/doi/10.5114/biolsport.2020.94237 |
| Özet |
| This study aimed to compare the effects of 5-week running-based high-intensity interval training (HIIT) vs. small-sided game training (SSG) on the physical performance, psychophysiological responses and technical skills in young soccer players. Twenty young male soccer players (age: 14.20.5 years, height: 161.87.9 cm) participated in this study and were assigned to two groups: The HIIT group (n=10) and SSG group (n=10). Both groups trained twice per week with a similar total training duration. The SSG consisted of two 5-9 minutes of 2-A-side with 2-minute passive rest periods, whereas the HIIT consisted of 12-20 minutes of continuous runs at intensities (90 to 95%) related to the velocity obtained in the 30-15 intermittent fitness test. Before and after the 5-week training periods the following tests were completed: maximum oxygen consumption (VO2max) from the Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Test level 1 (YYIRTL-1), 10-30-m sprint test, countermovement jump [CMJ], squat jump [SJ], and drop jump [DJ]), 1000-m run test, zigzag agility, repeated sprint ability, 30-15 intermittent fitness test and speed dribbling ability test. Our results revealed meaningful improvements in YYIRTL-1 performance (SSG: 12.8%, standardized effect size [d]=-1.46; HIIT: 16.4%, d=3.27 and VO2max (SSG: 3.3%, d=-1.48; HIIT: 4.3%, d=2.61). There was a meaningful greater improvement in agility and technical test performances following the SSG training compared with the HIIT (p 0.05, d=ranging from 0.92 to 1.99). By contrast, the HIIT group showed meaningfully higher performance responses in terms of the 1000-m running time and repeated sprint test ability (p 0.05, d=ranging from 0.90 to 2.06). These results confirmed that SSG training might be a more effective training regime to improve technical ability and agility with greater enjoyment, whereas HIIT might be more suitable for speed-based conditioning in young soccer players. |
| Anahtar Kelimeler |
| Drill-based tasks | Football | Performance | Physical enjoyment | Psychophysiological responses | Technique |
BM Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları
| Atıf Sayıları | |
| WoS | 88 |
| SCOPUS | 111 |
| Google Scholar | 199 |