| Makale Türü |
|
| Makale Alt Türü | Ulusal alan endekslerinde (TR Dizin, ULAKBİM) yayınlanan tam makale |
| Dergi Adı | Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi |
| Dergi ISSN | 2148-127X |
| Dergi Tarandığı Indeksler | TR DİZİN |
| Makale Dili | İngilizce |
| Basım Tarihi | 11-2020 |
| Cilt No | 8 |
| Sayı | 11 |
| Sayfalar | 2378 / 2387 |
| DOI Numarası | 10.24925/turjaf.v8i11.2378-2387.3633 |
| Makale Linki | http://www.agrifoodscience.org/index.php/TURJAF/issue/view/92 |
| Özet |
| This paper studied the effect of livestock support policies applied in Turkey by a emprical study.The study was carried out based on the analysis of the data collected through surveys with a totalof 478 livestock enterprises in the TR83 region (including Amasya, Çorum, Samsun and Tokatprovinces). The enterprises included in the survey study were grouped into three categories by thenumber of their animals. Binary Logistic Regression Model was applied in order to define thepolicy-based support payment utilization probabilities of the enterprises and the factors affectingthem. It was determined that approximately 45% of the enterprises cannot utilize livestock supports.The most utilized support items by the enterprises were determined as calf support, support peranimal, forage plant support and raw milk support. A total of 65% of the enterprise owners thinkthat the support amount per animal is insufficient, but regard the mentioned support item as themost important factor for improving animal presence. The utilization rates vary in terms ofenterprise scales on the other hand. The support utilization likelihood of medium-scale enterprisesis 3.1 times higher than small-scale enterprises, and this likelihood is 1.7 times higher for big-scaleenterprises when compared with medium-scale enterprises. The study recommends that someregulations are needed in support of policies to enable a better improvement in animal presence anda homogenous distribution of support payments. |
| Anahtar Kelimeler |
| Atıf Sayıları | |
| TRDizin | 5 |
| Google Scholar | 10 |