Evaluation of the radiopacity of restorative materials with different structures and thicknesses using a digital radiography system
Yazarlar (3)
Ayla Yaylacı Ministry of Health Bursa Oral And Dental Health Education And Research Hospital, Türkiye
Doç. Dr. Emine ŞİRİN KARAARSLAN Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Doç. Dr. Hüseyin HATIRLI Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Türkiye
| Makale Türü |
Özgün Makale
(ESCI dergilerinde yayınlanan tam makale)
|
||
| Dergi Adı | Imaging Science in Dentistry | ||
| Dergi ISSN | 2233-7822 Dergi Bilgileri (2021) | ||
| Dergi Tarandığı Indeksler | Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI), Scopus, Pubmed, KoreaMed | ||
| Makale Dili | İngilizce | Basım Tarihi | 09-2021 |
| Kabul Tarihi | 26-02-2021 | Yayınlanma Tarihi | 01-01-2021 |
| Cilt / Sayı / Sayfa | 51 / 1 / 1–9 | DOI | 10.5624/isd.20200334 |
| Makale Linki | http://dx.doi.org/10.5624/isd.20200334 | ||
| UAK Araştırma Alanları |
Restoratif Diş Tedavisi
|
||
| Özet |
| Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the radiopacities of various types of restorative materials with different thicknesses compared with enamel, dentin, and aluminum. Materials and Methods Four bulk-fill resins, 2 hybrid ceramics, 2 micro-hybrid resin composites, 6 glass ionomer-based materials, 2 zinc phosphate cements, and an amalgam were used in the study. Twelve disk-shaped specimens were prepared from each of 17 restorative materials with thicknesses of 1 mm, 2 mm, and 4 mm (n=4). All the restorative material specimens with the same thickness, an aluminum (Al) step wedge, and enamel and dentin specimens were positioned on a phosphor storage plate and exposed using a dental X-ray unit. The mean gray values were measured on digital images and converted to equivalent Al thicknesses. Statistical analyses were performed using 2-way analysis of variance and the Bonferroni post hoc … |
| Anahtar Kelimeler |
| Dental | Dental Materials | Digital | Radiography |
BM Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları
| Atıf Sayıları | |
| Yöksis | 23 |
| Scopus | 34 |
| Google Scholar | 49 |
| PubMed | 14 |