The effect of the different restorations on fracture resistance of root-filled premolars
Yazarlar (5)
Hakan Göktürk Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Doç. Dr. Emine ŞİRİN KARAARSLAN Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Elif Tekin Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Bilal Holoğlu
Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Prof. Dr. Işıl SARIKAYA Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Türkiye
| Makale Türü |
Özgün Makale
(SSCI, AHCI, SCI, SCI-Exp dergilerinde yayınlanan tam makale)
|
||
| Dergi Adı | BMC Oral Health (Q1) | ||
| Dergi ISSN | 1472-6831 Wos Dergi Scopus Dergi | ||
| Dergi Tarandığı Indeksler | SCI-Expanded | ||
| Makale Dili | İngilizce | Basım Tarihi | 11-2018 |
| Cilt / Sayı / Sayfa | 18 / 1 / 196–0 | DOI | 10.1186/s12903-018-0663-7 |
| Makale Linki | https://bmcoralhealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12903-018-0663-7 | ||
| Özet |
| BackgroundThe study investigated the fracture resistance of root-filled maxillary premolars with class II cavities restored by different restorations.MethodsA total of 55 intact maxillary premolar teeth were included (n = 11). G1 as positive control group, 44 teeth underwent root canal treatment, and MOD cavities were prepared. (G2) no restoration, (G3) direct composite restoration, (G4) direct composite strengthened with buccal to lingual pre-impregnated glass-fibers and (G5) ceramic inlay restoration. After thermocycling, fracture resistance test was performed and fracture type was recorded. Data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA and Chisquare test.ResultsThe mean fracture resistance was as follows: G1 had the highest fracture resistance, G2 had the lowest (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the fracture resistance values of the groups that underwent different restorations (G3, G4, G5) (p … |
| Anahtar Kelimeler |
| Endodontic treatment | Fracture resistance | Pre-impregnated glass-fibers |
| Atıf Sayıları | |
| Google Scholar | 67 |
| Scopus | 11 |
| Web of Science | 26 |