The Efficiency of Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration in Endoscopic Retrograde-Cholangiopancreatography-Limited Setting in a Peripheral University Hospital
Yazarlar (6)
Doç. Dr. Murat YILDIRIM Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Doç. Dr. Mehmet Fatih DAŞIRAN Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Uğur ÖZSOY Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Doç. Dr. Emin Daldal Samsun Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Asım Kocabay Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Prof. Dr. İsmail Okan İstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi, Türkiye
| Makale Türü | Özgün Makale (SSCI, AHCI, SCI, SCI-Exp dergilerinde yayınlanan tam makale) | ||
| Dergi Adı | Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques (Q3) | ||
| Dergi ISSN | 1092-6429 Wos Dergi Scopus Dergi | ||
| Dergi Tarandığı Indeksler | SCI-Expanded | ||
| Makale Dili | İngilizce | Basım Tarihi | 12-2021 |
| Cilt / Sayı / Sayfa | 31 / 6 / 665–671 | DOI | 10.1089/lap.2020.0525 |
| Makale Linki | http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/lap.2020.0525 | ||
| UAK Araştırma Alanları |
Genel Cerrahi
|
||
| Özet |
| Background The aim of this study is to evaluate complications and costs in patients treated with laparoscopic and open method for common bile duct (CBD) stones. Secondary aim is to compare the effectiveness, safety, and outcomes of these methods. In addition, it is aimed to review the feasibility of laparoscopic method in rural areas. Methods Seventy-one patients were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were divided into two groups as open and laparoscopic surgical method. These groups were analyzed comparatively in terms of complications and costs. Subgroups were formed from patients who underwent T-tube drainage, primary closure, and biliary anastomosis as choledochotomy management. As a secondary outcome, these three subgroups were investigated in terms of complications and cost. Results The cost was lower in open method compared to laparoscopic method (484 ,707, P=. 002). There was … |
| Anahtar Kelimeler |
BM Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları
| Atıf Sayıları | |
| Google Scholar | 11 |