Increasıng antıbıotıc resıstance ıs the maın cause for the faılure of helıcobacter pylorı eradıcatıon comparıson of three trusted treatment protocols    
Yazarlar (8)
Sebahat Başyiğit
Ferdane Sapmaz
Prof. Dr. Abdullah Özgür YENİOVA Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Zeliha Asiltük
Murat Hokkaömeroğlu
Metin Uzman
Yaşar Nazlıgül
Erzincan Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Makale Türü Özgün Makale
Makale Alt Türü SSCI, AHCI, SCI, SCI-Exp dergilerinde yayınlanan tam makale
Dergi Adı Acta Medica Mediterranea
Dergi ISSN 0393-6384 Wos Dergi Scopus Dergi
Dergi Tarandığı Indeksler SCI-Expanded
Dergi Grubu Q4
Makale Dili İngilizce
Basım Tarihi 01-2016
Cilt No 32
Sayı 255
Sayfalar 255 / 260
DOI Numarası 10.19193/0393-6384_2016_2_44
Özet
Introduction: Because of the decrease in the success of standard triple treatment in Helicobacter pylori (HP) eradication, new treatment modalities has been developed. But it is not known which of them is the most suitable regimen. We aimed to compare eradication rates of different eradication protocols. Materials and methods: 273 patients with dyspeptic complaints and naïve Helicobacter pylori infection were randomized into three groups: 71 patients received quadruple therapy (QT) (proton pump inhibitor bid, bismuth salts 2x2, metronidazole 500 mg tid and tetracycline 500 mg qid, applied simultaneously for 14 days), 127 patients received concomitant therapy (CT) (proton pump inhibitor bid, amoxicillin 1000 mg bid, clarithromycin 500 mg bid and metronidazole 500 mg tid applied for 10 day) or 75 patients received levofloxacin containing sequential therapy (LST) (amoxicillin 1000 mg bid and proton pump inhibitor bid for first 5 days, following this proton pump inhibitor bid, levofloxacin 500 mg/day, metronidazole tid for remaining 5 days) . Results: There were no significant differences in eradication rates between three treatment groups in the intention to treat analysis [QT: 64,8% (53,6-76,0%); CT: 77,2% (70,0-84,4%); LST: 70,7% (65,4-81,1%), P > 0.05] and per protocol analysis [QT: 66,7% (55,7%-77,9%) CT: 77,8% (70,5-85,1%), LST: 72,6%,(62,4-82,8%), P > 0.05]. Conclusion: None of these three regimens were suitable for the consistent achievement of grade A results. It is still a challenge to define how eradication protocols can be improved in regions with high antibiotic resistance.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Amoxicillin | Antibiotic resistance | Clarithromycin | Levofloxacin | Metronidazole | Tetracycline