Effects of different nose types on class II treatments for female patients    
Yazarlar (3)
Özkan Semih Çankaya
Fatih Çelebi
Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Prof. Dr. Ali Altuğ BIÇAKÇI Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Makale Türü Açık Erişim Özgün Makale
Makale Alt Türü SSCI, AHCI, SCI, SCI-Exp dergilerinde yayınlanan tam makale
Dergi Adı PROGRESS IN ORTHODONTICS
Dergi ISSN 2196-1042
Dergi Tarandığı Indeksler SCI-Expanded
Makale Dili İngilizce
Basım Tarihi 12-2019
Cilt No 20
Sayı 1
Sayfalar 1 / 8
DOI Numarası 10.1186/s40510-019-0296-7
Makale Linki https://progressinorthodontics.springeropen.com/track/pdf/10.1186/s40510-019-0296-7
Özet
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different nose types on the perception of facial aesthetics following camouflage treatment and orthognathic surgery for skeletal class II female patients. A pre-treatment profile photograph of a skeletal class II adult patient was selected from the department archive. Two constructed photographs were created to represent orthognathic surgery and camouflage treatments with the aid of computer software. A total of 18 constructed images was composed using three profiles (pre-treatment, post-camouflage, and post-orthognathic surgery) and six nose types. These photographs were shown to the three groups (orthodontists, plastic surgeons, and lay people), and they were asked to assign an attractiveness score to each photo ranging from 0 to 100, with 0 indicating the least attractive and 100 indicating the most attractive. For the convex nose profiles, anterior movement of the mandible obtained by orthognathic surgery did not result in a significant change in the scores given by the lay people. When surgical or camouflage treatment was not implemented and, instead, just rhinoplasty was performed for these profiles, there was a significant increase in the aesthetic scores given by all groups. For the straight nose profiles, orthognathic surgery increased the attractiveness scores given by all groups. Furthermore, for all the profiles, extraction treatment did not affect the aesthetic scores given by any of the groups (P > 0.05). The lay people perceived that having a convex-bridged nose was a bigger problem than having a retrognathic profile. Overall, in terms of skeletal and dental orthodontic treatments, nose shape should be considered during the treatment planning process.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Camouflage treatment | Class II | Orthognathic surgery | Rhinoplasty
BM Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları
Atıf Sayıları
WoS 7
Effects of different nose types on class II treatments for female patients

Paylaş