Direct Income Subsidy Practices in Turkey   
Yazarlar (3)
Kızılaslan Nuray
İ Çetin
Hkızılaslan
Makale Türü Özgün Makale
Makale Alt Türü Diğer hakemli uluslarası dergilerde yayınlanan tam makale
Dergi Adı Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences
Dergi Tarandığı Indeksler ...
Makale Dili İngilizce
Basım Tarihi 01-2007
Cilt No 1
Sayı 2
Sayfalar 115 / 125
Özet
This study, first of all, explains the agricultural subsidization policies applied in Turkey so far and the reasons of changes in these policies. The definition, purpose and application method of Direct Income Subsidy that was put into practice instead of other subsidization tools in recent years are hereby examined in depth, and the practice is evaluated under the light of agricultural statistics. According to the conclusion of the research; Direct Income Subsidy which was applied independent from production did not provide an increase in agricultural production and productivity; on the contrary, the agricultural production and productivity decreased during the years when Direct Income Subsidy was applied. A great part of the given subsidy was not used in agricultural production. PSE (Producer Subsidy Equivalent) rates remained lower than both OECD countries and EU countries just like they were before the application of the program. In 2001, when the practice started, PSE and CSE (Consumer Subsidy Equivalent) rates went down to the lowest level and in that year; Turkey remained among the countries that gave the lowest subsidy to agriculture among all OECD countries.
Anahtar Kelimeler
BM Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları
Atıf Sayıları
Google Scholar 3

Paylaş