Deep learning versus gradient boosting machine for pan evaporation prediction       
Yazarlar (9)
Anurag Malik
Punjab Agricultural University, Hindistan
Mandeep Kaur Saggi
Thapar Institute Of Engineering & Technology, Hindistan
Sufia Rehman
Jamia Millia Islamia, Hindistan
Haroon Sajjad
Jamia Millia Islamia, Hindistan
Prof. Dr. Samed İNYURT Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Amandeep Singh Bhatia
Chitkara University, Punjab, Hindistan
Aitazaz Ahsan Farooque
University Of Prince Edward Island, Kanada
Atheer Y. Oudah
University Of Thi-Qar, Irak
Zaher Mundher Yaseen
South Ural State University, Rusya Federasyonu
Makale Türü Açık Erişim Özgün Makale
Makale Alt Türü SSCI, AHCI, SCI, SCI-Exp dergilerinde yayınlanan tam makale
Dergi Adı Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics
Dergi ISSN 1994-2060 Wos Dergi Scopus Dergi
Dergi Tarandığı Indeksler SCI-Expanded
Dergi Grubu Q1
Makale Dili Türkçe
Basım Tarihi 01-2022
Cilt No 16
Sayı 1
Sayfalar 570 / 587
DOI Numarası 10.1080/19942060.2022.2027273
Makale Linki http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2022.2027273
Özet
In the present study, two innovative techniques namely, Deep Learning (DL) and Gradient boosting Machine (GBM) models are developed based on a maximum air temperature ‘univariate modeling scheme’ for modeling the monthly pan evaporation (E pan) process. Monthly air temperature and pan evaporation are used to build the predictive models. These models are used for evaluating the evaporation prediction for the Kiashahr meteorological station located in the north of Iran and Ranichauri station positioned in Uttarakhand State of India. Findings indicated that the deep learning model was found best at Kiashahr station for testing datasets MAE (0.5691, mm/month), RMSE (0.7111, mm/month), NSE (0.7496), and IOA (0.9413). It can be concluded that in the semi-arid climate of Iran both of the used methods had the good capability in modeling of monthly E pan. However, DL predicted monthly E pan better than GBM. Moreover, the highest accuracy of the deep learning model was also observed for the Ranichauri station in terms of MAE = 0.3693 mm/month, RMSE = 0.4357 mm/month, NSE = 0.8344, & IOA = 0.9507 in testing stage. Overall, results expose the superior performance of DL-based models for both study stations and can also be utilized for various other environmental modeling.
Anahtar Kelimeler
deep learning | Evaporation | gradient boosting machine | Kiashahr | prediction | Ranichauri