Comparison of the use of the Valsalva maneuver and the eutectic mixture of local anesthetics EMLA to relieve venipuncture pain a randomized controlled trial
Yazarlar (6)
Mustafa Süren Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Ziya Kaya
Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Fatih Özkan Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Ünal Erkorkmaz Sakarya Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Semih Arıcı Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Prof. Dr. Serkan KARAMAN Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Türkiye
| Makale Türü | Özgün Makale (SSCI, AHCI, SCI, SCI-Exp dergilerinde yayınlanan tam makale) | ||
| Dergi Adı | JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA (Q4) | ||
| Dergi ISSN | 0913-8668 Wos Dergi Scopus Dergi | ||
| Dergi Tarandığı Indeksler | SCI-Expanded | ||
| Makale Dili | İngilizce | Basım Tarihi | 06-2013 |
| Cilt / Sayı / Sayfa | 27 / 3 / 407–411 | DOI | 10.1007/s00540-012-1540-1 |
| Makale Linki | http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00540-012-1540-1 | ||
| Özet |
| PurposeIntravenous cannulation is a painful and stressful procedure. The objective of this study was to compare the analgesic efficacy of the eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA®) with that of the Valsalva maneuver in adult patients during i.v. cannulation.MethodsOne hundred ninety-five patients were randomized prospectively to three groups. The dorsum of the nondominant hand was covered with a thick paste of 2.5 g of EMLA® cream in the EMLA® group (group E) and left for a minimum of 30 min before venipuncture. In the control group (group C), the same procedure was applied except that Vaseline® was used instead of the EMLA®. The Valsalva group (group V) were punctured during a Valsalva maneuver. The patients were placed in the supine position during venipuncture. The patients then scored the amount of pain on cannulation using an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS; 0 = no pain, 10 … |
| Anahtar Kelimeler |
| EMLA (R) | Pain | Topical anesthetic | Valsalva maneuver | Venipuncture |
BM Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları
| Atıf Sayıları | |
| Google Scholar | 43 |
| Web of Science | 21 |