The McGrath Series 5 video laryngoscope versus the Macintosh laryngoscope ARandomized Trial in Obstetric Patients
  
Yazarlar (8)
Semih Arıcı Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Prof. Dr. Serkan KARAMAN Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Serkan Doğru
Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Prof. Dr. Tuğba KARAMAN Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Prof. Dr. Hakan TAPAR Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Prof. Dr. Asker Zeki ÖZSOY Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Ziya Kaya
Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Mustafa Süren Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Makale Türü Açık Erişim Özgün Makale (SSCI, AHCI, SCI, SCI-Exp dergilerinde yayınlanan tam makale)
Dergi Adı Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences (Q4)
Dergi ISSN 1300-0144 Wos Dergi Scopus Dergi
Dergi Tarandığı Indeksler SCI-Expanded
Makale Dili İngilizce Basım Tarihi 01-2014
Cilt / Sayı / Sayfa 44 / 3 / 387–392 DOI 10.3906/sag-1306-71
Özet
Background/aim: Anesthesiologists have encountered various difficulties in securing the airway. Therefore, we compare the intubation times and hemodynamic changes between the McGrath Series 5 video laryngoscope and the Macintosh laryngoscope. Materials and methods: A total of 80 obstetric patients were divided into 2 groups, orotracheally intubated with either the McGrath video laryngoscope or the Macintosh laryngoscope. The intubation times, Cormack Lehane grade, percentage of glottic opening, mean arterial blood pressure, and heart rates were compared among the groups. Results: Intubation time in the McGrath video laryngoscope group was significantly longer than in the Macintosh laryngoscope group (P < 0.01). The percentage of glottic opening was found to be higher in the McGrath video laryngoscope group (P = 0.002). Conclusion: The McGrath Series 5 video laryngoscope provides excellent views during orotracheal intubation in obstetric anesthesia with normal airways.
Anahtar Kelimeler