Comparative evaluation of the reliability and validity of three data extraction programs: UnGraph, GraphClick, and DigitizeIt
Yazarlar (4)
Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Harran Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Doç. Dr. Oğuzcan ÇIĞ
Mersin Üniversitesi, Türkiye
| Makale Türü | Özgün Makale |
| Makale Alt Türü | SSCI, AHCI, SCI, SCI-Exp dergilerinde yayınlanan tam makale |
| Dergi Adı | COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR |
| Dergi ISSN | 0747-5632 Wos Dergi Scopus Dergi |
| Dergi Tarandığı Indeksler | SSCI |
| Dergi Grubu | Q4 |
| Makale Dili | İngilizce |
| Basım Tarihi | 02-2016 |
| Cilt No | 55 |
| Sayfalar | 159 / 166 |
| DOI Numarası | 10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.008 |
| Özet |
| The use of evidence-based practices in education has been gaining a lot of attention in recent years. Researchers often use meta-analyses to identify evidence-based practices. To conduct meta-analyses of studies employing single-subject experimental research (SSER) designs for the purpose of identifying evidence base for a practice, a necessary step is to obtain raw data from published graphs. One method for obtaining raw data from published SSER graphs is the use of computer programs specifically designed to extract data from graphs. Purpose of the present study was to examine the reliability and validity of three data extraction programs, Ungraph, GraphClick, and DigitizeIt, using 60 graphs obtained from 15 SSER studies focused on a practice. Three coders extracted data from the graphs using the three programs. Values extracted by each coder were compared to (a) each other (reliability) and (b … |
| Anahtar Kelimeler |
| Data extraction programs | Reliability and validity | Single-subject experimental research designs | UnGraph | GraphClick | DigitizeIt |
BM Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları
| Atıf Sayıları | |
| WoS | 70 |
| Google Scholar | 90 |