Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Tuberculosis-Related Stigma scale (Psicométricas da Versão Turca da Escala Tuberculosis-Related Stigma)
Yazarlar (7)
Koç University, Türkiye
Koç University, Türkiye
Doç. Dr. Aygül KISSAL
Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Atatürk Üniversitesi, Türkiye
| Makale Türü |
Özgün Makale
|
| Makale Alt Türü | SSCI, AHCI, SCI, SCI-Exp dergilerinde yayınlanan tam makale |
| Dergi Adı | Acta Paulista De Enfermagem |
| Dergi ISSN | 0103-2100 Wos Dergi Scopus Dergi |
| Dergi Tarandığı Indeksler | SCI-Expanded |
| Dergi Grubu | Q4 |
| Makale Dili | İngilizce |
| Basım Tarihi | 07-2018 |
| Cilt No | 31 |
| Sayı | 4 |
| Sayfalar | 374 / 381 |
| DOI Numarası | 10.1590/1982-0194201800053 |
| Makale Linki | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1982-0194201800053 |
| Özet |
| Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the validity and reliability of the Turkish “Tuberculosis-Related Stigma Scale”. Methods: This study used methodological design. This methodological study was conducted with 263 with individuals who not being diagnosed as pulmonary tuberculosis. We also used Pearson correlation analysis, Cronbach alpha coefficient, item total correlation and factor analysis for the study data. Results: In this study, Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was .83 for the subscale community perspectives and .89 for the subscale patient perspectives. RMSEA was 0.077, NFI was 0.91, CFI was 0.94, RMR was 0.056, SRM was 0.079, GFI was 0.95, AGFI was 0.94, x2 was 582.84, SD was 228 and x2/SD was 2.55 (p= 0.000). Clearly, all model fit indices were acceptable. Conclusion: In the light of the findings, Turkish version of Tuberculosis-Related Stigma Scale has acceptable validity and reliability for use in Turkish population. |
| Anahtar Kelimeler |
| Tuberculosis | Stigmatization | Stigma of tuberculosis scale | Reliability and validity |
BM Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları
| Atıf Sayıları | |
| WoS | 4 |
| SCOPUS | 4 |
| Google Scholar | 7 |
| Google Scholar | 3 |