Magnetic resonance imaging findings of intracranial hypotension       
Yazarlar (3)
Doç. Dr. Murat BEYHAN Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Prof. Dr. Erkan GÖKÇE Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Şükrüye Firuze Ocak Karataş
Tokat State Hospital, Türkiye
Makale Türü Özgün Makale
Makale Alt Türü SSCI, AHCI, SCI, SCI-Exp dergilerinde yayınlanan tam makale
Dergi Adı Neurological Sciences
Dergi ISSN 1590-1874 Wos Dergi Scopus Dergi
Dergi Tarandığı Indeksler SCI-Expanded
Dergi Grubu Q2
Makale Dili İngilizce
Basım Tarihi 05-2022
Cilt No 43
Sayı 5
Sayfalar 3343 / 3351
DOI Numarası 10.1007/s10072-021-05782-2
Makale Linki http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10072-021-05782-2
Özet
Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the differences in the sizes and configurations of various structures on brain MRIs of patients with intracranial hypotension (ICH) compared to normal individuals. Methods: The present study consisted of two study groups as 21 patients with intracranial hypotension and 21 healthy individuals. Cranial MRI findings of patients with intracranial hypotension were compared retrospectively with MRI findings of patients without any pathology. Pachymeningeal enhancement, mamillopontine distance, venous sinus diameters, transverse and straight sinus distension, pituitary gland enlargement, tonsillar herniation, bleeding (subdural, epidural), pontomesencephalic angle, lateral ventricular angle, and pituitary infundibular angle were evaluated on MRI. Results: Intracranial hypotension developed spontaneously in 6 cases and secondary in 15 patients. Diffuse pachymeningeal enhancement was observed in all intracranial hypotension cases. In addition, transverse sinus distension was observed in 19 cases, straight sinus distension in 17 cases, subdural effusion in 7 cases, spinal epidural effusion in 3 cases, tonsillar herniation in 2 cases, and thrombosis in dural sinuses in 2 cases. The intracranial hypotension group vs control group had dominant transverse sinus diameter 10 ± 1.75 vs 7.52 ± 1.2 mm, straight sinus diameter 4.76 ± 0.92 vs 3.69 ± 0.57 mm, superior sagittal sinus diameter 8.35 ± 1.57 vs 6.37 ± 0.71 mm, pontomesencephalic angle 46.67 ± 9.73° vs 56.27° ± 8.9°, mamillopontine distance 5.83 ± 1.5 vs 6.85 ± 1.1 mm, lateral ventricular angle 131.13° ± 6.17° vs 135.19° ± 5.28°, pituitary infundibular angle 44.42° ± 12.09° vs 63.3° ± 11.56°, and pituitary gland height 8.5 ± 1.83 vs 5.5 ± 1.27 mm, respectively. Conclusion: In cases with clinically suspected intracranial hypotension, MRI findings may contribute to the diagnosis of intracranial hypotension with quantitative evaluations.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Dural enhancement | Intracranial hypotension | Magnetic resonance imaging | Orthostatic headache
BM Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları
Atıf Sayıları
WoS 7
SCOPUS 9
Google Scholar 10
Magnetic resonance imaging findings of intracranial hypotension

Paylaş