2008 Küresel Kriz Sonrası Türkiye’de Ekonomik İstikrarın Sağlanmasında Siyasi İstikrarın Rolü üzerine Bir Değerlendirme (Politic Economy of Globalization Financialization Crises)
Yazarlar (3)
Doç. Dr. Nalan KANGAL EROĞLU
Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Prof. Dr. İlhan EROĞLU
Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Doç. Dr. Mustafa Necati ÇOBAN
Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Türkiye
| Kitap Adı | Politic Economy of Globalization Financialization Crises |
| Bölüm(ler) | 2008 Küresel Kriz Sonrası Türkiye’de Ekonomik İstikrarın Sağlanmasında Siyasi İstikrarın Rolü üzerine Bir Değerlendirme |
| Bölüm Sayfaları | 93-102 |
| Kitap Türü | Kitap Bölümü |
| Kitap Alt Türü | Alanında uluslararası yayınlanan kitap bölümü |
| Kitap Niteliği | Diğer uluslararası bilimsel kitap |
| Kitap Dili | Türkçe |
| Basım Tarihi | 01-2016 |
| ISBN | 978-0-9932118-3-6 |
| Basıldığı Ülke | İngiltere |
| Basıldığı Şehir | London |
| Özet |
| This edited book is a collection of selected papers, presented at the International Conference of Political Economy (ICOPEC 2016). The deliberate employment of the term “political economy” in the title “International Conference of Political Economy” implies the fact that economics is perceived as an integral part of social phenomena in the International Conference of Political Economy (ICOPEC). Accordingly, even if economic institutions and relations form the foundations of society in the contemporary world, economic development is dependent on social power and dynamics, while economic policies, per se, are shaped by not only technical processes but also diverse interests and choices. Within this context, politics is involved in every encounter between different economic classes, social groups and genders being shaped by the visions of a better life as the subject matter of philosophy, ethics and religion and at times it finds its best expression in art. Law, on the other hand, is the embodiment of all social relations which are, in their essence, political. Thus, this conference does not reduce society to market relations only, despite positioning the economy in the heart of social relations. Above all, it considers the society as a political entity. Indeed, everything constitutes the subject matter of politics. The arguments in favour of purifying market relations from the influence of politics and the discourse that they take place on their own right serve to disguise the conflicts of interest and power asymmetries inherent therein. This conference regards man as homo politicus, as Aristoteles put it, rather than homo economicus. In 2016, ICOPEC conferences … |
| Anahtar Kelimeler |
