Can Bedside Focused Ultrasonography Cause Confusion in Patient Diagnosis?    
Yazarlar (2)
Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Sefa Erdi ÖMÜR Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Doç. Dr. Çağrı ZORLU Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Makale Türü Açık Erişim Diğer (Teknik, not, yorum, vaka takdimi, editöre mektup, özet, kitap krıtiği, araştırma notu, bilirkişi raporu ve benzeri)
Makale Alt Türü ESCI dergilerinde yayınlanan teknik not, editöre mektup, tartışma, vaka takdimi ve özet türünden makale
Dergi Adı European Journal of Therapeutics
Dergi ISSN 2564-7784 Wos Dergi
Dergi Tarandığı Indeksler ESCI
Makale Dili İngilizce
Basım Tarihi 10-2025
Cilt No 31
Sayı 5
Sayfalar 369 / 370
DOI Numarası 10.58600/eurjther2812
Makale Linki https://doi.org/10.58600/eurjther2812
Özet
Dear Editor, We read with great interest the article “Diagnostic Evaluation of Patients Presenting with Dyspnea to the Emergency Department Using Bedside Focused Ultrasonography” written by Bozkurt and colleagues and published in the European Journal of Threapeutics Eur J Ther. 2025;31(3):137-145 (1). We would like to ask the authors some questions about the article and the study. Our first question to the authors is who performed the bedside ultrasound procedures, and are there any other confounding diagnoses that might be overlooked during diagnosis (such as chronic thromboembolism associated with acute heart failure, or flap failure with preserved ejection fraction associated with hyperclassificatory pulmonary edema). When diagnosing heart failure in patients, biomarkers such as BNP and NT-proBNP should be studied, particularly in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction also, whether evidence of cardiac structural and/or functional abnormalities consistent with the presence of LV diastolic dysfunction/raised LV filling pressures is checked on echocardiography (2). Whether patients diagnosed with pulmonary embolism have acute or chronic pulmonary embolism? If acute pulmonary embolism is present, whether the patients are hemodynamically stable or not should be specified. D-dimer should be measured first in hemodynamically stable patients. Right heart changes are not specific for pulmonary embolism (3). Specifically, in Table 3, an IVC diameter greater than 2.1 mm is included among the echocardiographic findings of right heart failure and pulmonary hypertension. However, could the fact that right ventricular dilatation was detected in only nine patients have caused diagnostic confusion? These are the questions we would like to ask politely of the esteemed authors. Yours sincerely,
Anahtar Kelimeler
BM Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları
Atıf Sayıları
TRDizin 1
Can Bedside Focused Ultrasonography Cause Confusion in Patient Diagnosis?

Paylaş