Multi-instrument assessment of physical activity in female office workers       
Yazarlar (6)
Sema Can
Hitit Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Nevin Gündüz
Ankara Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Prof. Dr. Erşan ARSLAN Siirt Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Elzbıeta Bıernat
Szkola Glówna Handlowa W Warszawie, Polonya
Gülfem Ersöz
Ankara Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Prof. Dr. Bülent KİLİT Tekirdağ Namık Kemal Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Makale Türü Açık Erişim Özgün Makale
Makale Alt Türü SSCI, AHCI, SCI, SCI-Exp dergilerinde yayınlanan tam makale
Dergi Adı INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
Dergi ISSN 1232-1087 Wos Dergi Scopus Dergi
Dergi Tarandığı Indeksler SCI-Expanded
Dergi Grubu Q4
Makale Dili İngilizce
Basım Tarihi 01-2016
Cilt No 29
Sayı 6
Sayfalar 937 / 945
DOI Numarası 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.00710
Makale Linki http://ijomeh.eu/Multi-instrument-assessment-of-physical-activity-in-female-office-workers,60993,0,2.html
Özet
Objectives: The aim of this study was to examine the multi-instrument assessment of physical activity in female office workers. Material and Methods: Fifty healthy women (age (mean ± standard deviation): 34.8±5.9 years, body height: 158±0.4 cm, body weight: 61.8±7.5 kg, body mass index: 24.6±2.7 kg/m2) workers from the same workplace volunteered to participate in the study. Physical activity was measured with the 7-day Physical Activity Assessment Questionnaire (7-d PAAQ), an objective multi-sensor armband tool, and also a waist-mounted pedometer, which were both worn for 7 days. Results: A significant correlation between step numbers measured by armband and pedometer was observed (r = 0.735), but the step numbers measured by these 2 methods were significantly different (10 941±2236 steps/day and 9170±2377 steps/day, respectively; p < 0.001). There was a weak correlation between the value of 7-d PAAQ total energy expenditure and the value of armband total energy expenditure (r = 0.394, p = 0.005). However, total energy expenditure values measured by armband and 7-d PAAQ were not significantly different (2081±370 kcal/day and 2084±197 kcal/day, respectively; p = 0.96). In addition, physical activity levels (average daily metabolic equivalents (MET)) measured by armband and 7-d PAAQ were not significantly different (1.45±0.12 MET/day and 1.47±0.24 MET/day, respectively; p = 0.44). Conclusions: The results of this study showed that the correlation between pedometer and armband measurements was higher than that between armband measurements and 7-d PAAQ self-reports. Our results suggest that none of the assessment methods examined here, 7-d PAAQ, pedometer, or armband, is sufficient when used as a single tool for physical activity level determination. Therefore, multi-instrument assessment methods are preferable.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Female office workers | Pedometer | Physical activity | Questionnaire | Sedentary lifestyle | Sensewear armband